"Yes to nuclear power of the Senate" Green economy "goodbye"
Matteo Bartocci
An overwhelming majority but decidedly listless decided without too many worries
the mood Return to Italy nuclear power. In
center empty pews, intervention pro-nuke zero (no need),
little desire to work, because everything is already decided and distant.
So much so that for most of the day the Senate lacks even the number
office to meet. The fateful return to the atom is decided
less than two hours even if the word end, soon, it's up to
room.
The debate in the classroom seems to industrial archeology, with a bill
so-called 'development' as a stimulus to the economy against the financial crisis does not allocate
a € (you do everything to a zero balance) but in return a bill becomes
"sausage" that contains everything. The 17 articles written
December are now over 30. Since the suspension of "class
action 'to the facilities for camping, by the abolition of
" sheets "of Bersani insurance car to fight against false
bags and, of course, to return to nuclear power. As is customary in the era
Berlusconi, the parliament has little or nothing. Articles 14 and 15 of
bill empowered the government to decide within six months and places
criteria for the construction of nuclear plants and sites for waste storage
. Both areas will be top secret, "
of national strategic interest" and therefore protected by the army, as
landfills Napoli.Già Berlusconi signed in February with
Sarkozy agreements to build the central Italian EPR
all'Edf class, the French public body electric partner Enel. Will
Paris, however, to put the technology. And Italy is preparing to
grant him carte blanche.
For plants will permit one that will be worth as
clearance, administrative act of consent, license, lease and
expropriation. To stop the process may be the only
Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA and SEA). So much for federalism nor
common or regions will have their say. 'sites will be chosen
firms' , report Roberto Della Seta, former Democratic Party of Legambiente. And
to get away from the only appeals court empowered to decide
will be the Tar of Lazio, a kind of new Supreme Court for all
As regards energy. Types of systems, relationships with manufacturers
and procedures will be decided by CIPE, ie by the government,
after definitive yes.
not even miss the amendment "bullshit." Sogin will again
commissioner and perhaps privatized after the happy period of
Prodi government. The public agency dedicated to the disposal of nuclear
Italian civilian and not a secondary business, submarines
former Soviet (see the manifesto of February 1) will have a separate budget
opaque and managed by a commissioner and two vice. As it happens three places as
Fi Alliance and the League.
And the cost? Currently an estimated 5 billion to central, but in
Finland and France (the last EU countries to build them) between the first stone and
delivery costs have doubled. The cake is so original
least 20 billion euro. In times of crisis it is understandable why
even the United States, with all their nuclear arsenal, not
build a new power plant since '72. It 'a fact that
then no country in the world has invested in nuclear power unless
we already had.
But where will the new facilities? The government wants two in the North, a
the Centre and the South (1600 MW each). Structures of that size, however
consume so much water. The rivers, even the Po, are
unreliable and should therefore be to make them close to the sea. But what
coast? And what charges desalination? The parliament trusts,
then we'll see.
The barricades are not seen. Indeed. The Democratic Party voted against not
'injury antinuclear " but for" reasons economic merit ",
stresses Gian Carlo Sangalli on behalf of Democrats. Italy today
can produce 90 thousand MW. A third of them with gas-fired plants
built in the last 15 years, no European country has done
same. "The Italian power system - remember Sangalli -
has an overcapacity of historic proportions. Many new power plants
in the Po valley are used to 50%. Thinking of making new
at this time is an economic paradox, and would represent a further
would cost the already high prices Energy. " For
Grazia Francescato (Greens), the nuclear madness, "In 2000 a kg
uranium cost $ 7 while today it costs more than 120 .
spend tens of billions for power already obsolete and which will be released maybe in 2020
means giving up the green economy on which
strongly link Obama, Merkel, Sarkozy and Zapatero. " Right and left
, all but us.
Link here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment